×

Compare cars

Add car to list

status: Concept
1985 Alfa Romeo 75 Sedan 2.0 TD MT (96 h.p.) specifications

1985 Alfa Romeo 75 Sedan 2.0 TD MT (96 h.p.)
1985 Alfa Romeo 75 Sedan 2.0 TD MT (96 h.p.)
1985 Alfa Romeo 75 Sedan 2.0 TD MT (96 h.p.)

Brief

1985 Alfa Romeo 75 Sedan 2.0 TD MT (96 h.p.)
This car is developed by the brand in Italy. This model to accelerate from 0 to 100 km in 12.4 (sec.) The maximum speed reaches 175 km/h.

  • Acceleration 0-100 km/h for 12.4 sec.
  • Engine specs: 96 h.p. 2.0 TD MT (96 h.p.)

The width of the car is 1.63 mm. Curb weight (USA) or kerb weight (GB) is 1190 kg. If you are the owner of this model, write your driving history or review. All the pros and cons of this car.

It will be useful:

How fast you car? When did you buy it? What size engine and how much power? For how many seconds you accelerated 0-100 km/h. This and other information will be useful for comparing this car.

Interior

No photos found

Exterior

No photos found

Specs

General Specs

Body Style
Sedan

The Size

Width, mm
1.63
Class Car
C-segment (medium car)
Length, mm
4.33
Year
1985
Height, mm
1.35
Fuel System
Disel
Curb Weight, kg
1190
Driven Wheels
Rear wheel drive
Ground Clearance, cm
1.2
Country
Italy
Disk, R.
0

Fuel Consumption, l/100 km

City Cycle
0
Highway Cycle
0
Combined Cycle
7.6

Engine Specs

Power h.p.
96

Dynamic Performance

Transmission
Manual
Engine capacity, L
1.995
Acceleration 0-100 km/h, sec
12.4
Engine
2.0 TD MT (96 h.p.)
Max. speed, km / h
175
Engine Capacity
1995 cm3
 
 
Max. power, kWt
193
 
 
Fuel Tank Capacity
49
 
 

Advanced

Mixed driving fuel consumption per 100 km, litre
7.6
Max power at RPM, RPM
to 4 300
Turnover of maximum torque, RPM
2300
Cylinder layout
Inline
Injection type
Multi-point fuel injection
Boost type
Turbo
Number of cylinders
4
Valves per cylinder
2
Cylinder bore, mm
88
Stroke cycle, mm
82
Number of gear
5
Turning circle, m
10.9
Number of seater
5
Wheelbase, mm
2510
Front track, mm
1369
Rear track, mm
1359
Full weight, kg
1615
Min trunk capacity, litre
498
Max trunk capacity, litre
498
Front suspension
Independent, Torsion, Double wishbone, Stabilizer bar
Back suspension
Helical springs
Front brakes
Disc
Rear brakes
Disc

Crash test

NHTSA overall rating
0
NHTSA head-on collision
0
NHTSA lateral collision
0
IIHS front severe collision
0
IIHS front faint collision
0
IIHS lateral collision
0
IIHS back collision
0
IIHS coup
0
Video crash tests

User rating

0.0
0 voted

Maximum speed you developed on this car?

from 50 to 500    mile/hour

Price Analysis

MSRP

Unknown $

Instant Market Value, $/year

Сurrently there are no price data

Auto loan calculator, $/m

Price of car:

$

Interest rate of the bank:

Bank rate:

%

Number of months:

 

TOTAL: 0.00$

Similar cars

1988 Nissan Cefiro Sedan 2.0 MT (155 h.p.)
1988 Nissan Cefiro Sedan 2.0 MT (155 h.p.)

Power: 155 hp. Volume: 1998cm3 Fuel: Gasoline Drive unit: Rear wheel drive

Average price — 0 $

2010 Hyundai ix35 Crossover 5-doors 2.0 CRDi MT 4WD (184 h.p.)
2010 Hyundai ix35 Crossover 5-doors 2.0 CRDi MT 4WD (184 h.p.)

Power: 184 hp. Volume: 1995cm3 Fuel: Disel Drive unit: Four wheel drive (4WD)

Average price — 0 $

2015 Chevrolet Niva Crossover 5-doors 1.7 MT (80 h.p.) LE+
2015 Chevrolet Niva Crossover 5-doors 1.7 MT (80 h.p.) LE+

Power: 80 c. Volume: 1690cm3 Fuel: Gasoline Drive unit: All wheel drive (AWD)

Average price — 0 $

2013 Daewoo Matiz Hatchback 0.8 MT (51 h.p.) LOW COST
2013 Daewoo Matiz Hatchback 0.8 MT (51 h.p.) LOW COST

Power: 51 c. Volume: 796cm3 Fuel: Gasoline Drive unit: Front wheel drive

Average price — 0 $

1996 Nissan Pathfinder Crossover 3.3 4WD MT (150 h.p.)
1996 Nissan Pathfinder Crossover 3.3 4WD MT (150 h.p.)

Power: 150 hp. Volume: 3275cm3 Fuel: Gasoline Drive unit: All wheel drive (AWD)

Average price — 0 $

2001 BMW 3 serie Touring wagon 325i MT (192 h.p.)
2001 BMW 3 serie Touring wagon 325i MT (192 h.p.)

Power: 192 hp. Volume: 2494cm3 Fuel: Gasoline Drive unit: Rear wheel drive

Average price — 0 $

Reviews

Leave a comment can only registered users
login · Sign Up
Write a review

Comment